Follow ScienceBlips on Twitter
Blog Reactions
Pharyngula: Ray Comfort Replies to Eugenie Scott
NCSE - National Center for Science Education - Defending the Teaching of Evolution in Public Schools.: NCSE's Scott tackles creationist Origin
Greg Laden's Blog: Eugenie Scott Tackles Modified Origin Book
Reactions
 |
Thinking man's read for the day: http://tinyurl.com/yjxo9tz 17 days ago |
 |
RT @RevReinard: Ray Comfort is still a lying idiot: http://is.gd/4M7Cr #evolution | Comfort clearly does not understand evolution AT ALL. 18 days ago |
 |
Comfort: "I'm not an expert on the subject of evolution." No shit! http://bit.ly/1WS8R4 18 days ago |
Ray Comfort Replies to Eugenie Scott
Pharyngula —
... I could only get two paragraphs into that sleazebag's reply in the debate about his Origin giveaway before I had to close the window and throw him away. ...
NCSE's Scott tackles creationist Origin
NCSE - National Center for Science Education - Defending the Teaching of Evolution in Public Schools. —
[image] NCSE's executive director Eugenie C. Scott was invited to debate Ray Comfort, a creationist in the news recently for his plans to distribute copies of the Origin of Species with his own introduction, on the God & Country blog of U.S. News & World Report . Comfort began the debate on October 29, 2009; Scott replied on October 30, 2009; Comfort responded on November 2, 2009; and Scott replied on November 3, 2009. The debate, according to Dan Gilgoff, who maintains the blog, elicited "more feedback than any other issue on this ...
Eugenie Scott Tackles Modified Origin Book
Greg Laden's Blog —
... And she concluded, "Anyone who honestly examines the data supporting evolution -- even a young-earth creationist [such as Bryan College's Todd C. Wood, whom Scott quoted as acknowledging, "Evolution is not a theory in crisis"] -- concludes that the science is strong. If you reject evolution, you are doing it for religious reasons. You're entitled to your religious opinions -- but not to your own scientific facts." For the debate, visit: this , this , this , this , and this . Gilgoff's comments on the reception of the debate
